×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.18ct Topaz (Pear, 4.9×2.95mm, Blue) vs 1ct Topaz (Pear, 8.67×5.22mm, Blue)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1ct Topaz (8.67×5.22mm, pear cut) appears 3.1 times larger than 0.18ct Topaz (4.9×2.95mm, pear cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger. 

0.18ct Topaz (pear cut)
vs
1ct Topaz (pear cut)
blue
 
blue
4.9×2.95 mm 8.67×5.22 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.18ct Topaz (pear cut, 4.9×2.95mm, Blue color)   Actual size of 1ct Topaz (pear cut, 8.67×5.22mm, Blue color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 0.18ct Topaz (pear cut, 4.9×2.95mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Blue 1ct Topaz (pear cut, 8.67×5.22mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
18% vs 31%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.18ct Topaz Pear (4.9×2.95mm, Blue) and 1ct Topaz Pear (8.67×5.22mm, Blue) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.18 Ct Topaz (Pear) 1 Ct Topaz (Pear)
4.9×2.95 mm vs 8.67×5.22 mm
10.55 mm²   33.04 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1ct Topaz (8.67×5.22mm, pear cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.18ct Topaz (4.9×2.95mm, pear cut)
0.18ct Topaz Pear (4.9×2.95mm)
1ct Topaz Pear (8.67×5.22mm)
Difference: 213% (22.49 mm²)
1ct Topaz (Pear, 8.67×5.22mm) has approx. 213% more face-up area than 0.18ct Topaz (Pear, 4.9×2.95mm). In other words, it's 3.13x larger.


Popular comparisons: