×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

1.21ct Spinel (Oval, 8×6mm, Red) vs 0.5ct Emerald (Trillion, 6.36×6.36mm, Green)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1.21ct Spinel (8×6mm, oval cut) appears 57% larger than 0.5ct Emerald (6.36×6.36mm, trillion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

1.21ct Spinel (oval cut)
vs
0.5ct Emerald (trillion cut)
red
 
green
8×6 mm 6.36×6.36 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1.21ct Spinel (oval cut, 8×6mm, Red color)   Actual size of 0.5ct Emerald (trillion cut, 6.36×6.36mm, Green color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 1.21ct Spinel (oval cut, 8×6mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Green 0.5ct Emerald (trillion cut, 6.36×6.36mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
36% vs 38%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1.21ct Spinel Oval (8×6mm, Red) and 0.5ct Emerald Trillion (6.36×6.36mm, Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Spinel will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (3.6 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1.21 Ct Spinel (Oval) 0.5 Ct Emerald (Trillion)
8×6 mm vs 6.36×6.36 mm
39.36 mm²   25.08 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1.21ct Spinel (8×6mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.5ct Emerald (6.36×6.36mm, trillion cut)
1.21ct Spinel Oval (8×6mm)
0.5ct Emerald Trillion (6.36×6.36mm)
Difference: 57% (14.28 mm²)
1.21ct Spinel (Oval, 8×6mm) has approx. 57% more face-up area than 0.5ct Emerald (Trillion, 6.36×6.36mm).


Popular comparisons: