×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

1.2ct Ruby (Oval, 8.04×5.36mm, Red) vs 1.1ct Ruby (Oval, 7.82×5.21mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1.2ct Ruby (8.04×5.36mm, oval cut) appears 6% larger than 1.1ct Ruby (7.82×5.21mm, oval cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

1.2ct Ruby (oval cut)
vs
 1.1ct Ruby (oval cut)
red
 
red
8.04×5.36 mm 7.82×5.21 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1.2ct Ruby (oval cut, 8.04×5.36mm, Red color)   Actual size of 1.1ct Ruby (oval cut, 7.82×5.21mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 1.2ct Ruby (oval cut, 8.04×5.36mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 1.1ct Ruby (oval cut, 7.82×5.21mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 32% vs 31%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1.2ct Ruby Oval (8.04×5.36mm, Red) and 1.1ct Ruby Oval (7.82×5.21mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1.2 Ct Ruby (Oval) 1.1 Ct Ruby (Oval)
8.04×5.36 mm vs 7.82×5.21 mm
35.34 mm²   33.41 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1.2ct Ruby (8.04×5.36mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 1.1ct Ruby (7.82×5.21mm, oval cut)
1.2ct Ruby Oval (8.04×5.36mm)
1.1ct Ruby Oval (7.82×5.21mm)
Difference: 6% (1.93 mm²)
1.2ct Ruby (Oval, 8.04×5.36mm) has approx. 6% more face-up area than 1.1ct Ruby (Oval, 7.82×5.21mm).


Popular comparisons: