×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

1ct Topaz (Emerald, 6.66×4.93mm, Blue) vs 0.5ct Topaz (Round, 5×5mm, Blue)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1ct Topaz (6.66×4.93mm, emerald cut) appears 56% larger than 0.5ct Topaz (5×5mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

1ct Topaz (emerald cut)
vs
 0.5ct Topaz (round cut)
blue
 
blue
6.66×4.93 mm 5×5 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1ct Topaz (emerald cut, 6.66×4.93mm, Blue color)   Actual size of 0.5ct Topaz (round cut, 5×5mm, Blue color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 1ct Topaz (emerald cut, 6.66×4.93mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Blue 0.5ct Topaz (round cut, 5×5mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 30% vs 30%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1ct Topaz Emerald (6.66×4.93mm, Blue) and 0.5ct Topaz Round (5×5mm, Blue) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1 Ct Topaz (Emerald) 0.5 Ct Topaz (Round)
6.66×4.93 mm vs 5×5 mm
30.54 mm²   19.63 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1ct Topaz (6.66×4.93mm, emerald cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.5ct Topaz (5×5mm, round cut)
1ct Topaz Emerald (6.66×4.93mm)
0.5ct Topaz Round (5×5mm)
Difference: 56% (10.91 mm²)
1ct Topaz (Emerald, 6.66×4.93mm) has approx. 56% more face-up area than 0.5ct Topaz (Round, 5×5mm).


Popular comparisons: