×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

2.02ct Sapphire (Trillion, 8×8mm, Dark Blue) vs 3.66ct Sapphire (Emerald, 9.77×6.94mm, Dark Bluish Green)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3.66ct Sapphire (9.77×6.94mm, emerald cut) appears 59% larger than 2.02ct Sapphire (8×8mm, trillion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

2.02ct Sapphire (trillion cut)
vs
 3.66ct Sapphire (emerald cut)
dark blue
 
dark bluish green
8×8 mm 9.77×6.94 mm
actual size
Actual size of 2.02ct Sapphire (trillion cut, 8×8mm, Dark Blue color)   Actual size of 3.66ct Sapphire (emerald cut, 9.77×6.94mm, Dark Bluish Green color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Dark Blue 2.02ct Sapphire (trillion cut, 8×8mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Dark Bluish Green 3.66ct Sapphire (emerald cut, 9.77×6.94mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 48% vs 42%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 2.02ct Sapphire Trillion (8×8mm, Dark Blue) and 3.66ct Sapphire Emerald (9.77×6.94mm, Dark Bluish Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


2.02 Ct Sapphire (Trillion) 3.66 Ct Sapphire (Emerald)
8×8 mm vs 9.77×6.94 mm
39.68 mm²   63.06 mm²
Face-up size outline for 3.66ct Sapphire (9.77×6.94mm, emerald cut)
Face-up size outline for 2.02ct Sapphire (8×8mm, trillion cut)
2.02ct Sapphire Trillion (8×8mm)
3.66ct Sapphire Emerald (9.77×6.94mm)
Difference: 59% (23.38 mm²)
3.66ct Sapphire (Emerald, 9.77×6.94mm) has approx. 59% more face-up area than 2.02ct Sapphire (Trillion, 8×8mm).


Popular comparisons: