×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

2.5ct Diamond (Radiant, 7.84×7.84mm, White) vs 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Radiant, 6.66×6.66mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 2.5ct Diamond (7.84×7.84mm, radiant cut) appears 39% larger than 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (6.66×6.66mm, radiant cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

2.5ct Diamond (radiant cut)
vs
2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (radiant cut)
white
 
white
7.84×7.84 mm 6.66×6.66 mm
actual size
Actual size of 2.5ct Diamond (radiant cut, 7.84×7.84mm, White color)   Actual size of 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (radiant cut, 6.66×6.66mm, White color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 2.5ct Diamond (radiant cut, 7.84×7.84mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (radiant cut, 6.66×6.66mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
47% vs 40%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 2.5ct Diamond Radiant (7.84×7.84mm, White) and 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia Radiant (6.66×6.66mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Cubic Zirconia will face-up smaller than Diamond for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (5.65 vs. 3.52 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Diamond of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


2.5 Ct Diamond (Radiant) 2.5 Ct Cubic Zirconia (Radiant)
7.84×7.84 mm vs 6.66×6.66 mm
58.39 mm²   42.14 mm²
Face-up size outline for 2.5ct Diamond (7.84×7.84mm, radiant cut)
Face-up size outline for 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (6.66×6.66mm, radiant cut)
2.5ct Diamond Radiant (7.84×7.84mm)
2.5ct Cubic Zirconia Radiant (6.66×6.66mm)
Difference: 39% (16.25 mm²)
2.5ct Diamond (Radiant, 7.84×7.84mm) has approx. 39% more face-up area than 2.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Radiant, 6.66×6.66mm).


Popular comparisons: