2.7ct Ruby (Pear, 10×7mm, Red) vs 3ct Ruby (Emerald, 8×10mm, Red)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3ct Ruby (8×10mm, emerald cut) appears 46% larger than 2.7ct Ruby (10×7mm, pear cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 2.7ct Ruby (pear cut) |
vs
|
3ct Ruby (emerald cut) |
|
red |
|
|
| 10×7 mm | 8×10 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
2.7ct Ruby Pear (10×7mm, Red)
and
3ct Ruby Emerald (8×10mm, Red)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 2.7 Ct Ruby (Pear) | 3 Ct Ruby (Emerald) | |
| 10×7 mm | vs | 8×10 mm |
| 51.1 mm² | 74.4 mm² |
| 2.7ct Ruby Pear (10×7mm) | |
| 3ct Ruby Emerald (8×10mm) | |
| Difference: 46% (23.3 mm²) |
3ct Ruby (Emerald, 8×10mm) has approx. 46% more face-up area than 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, 10×7mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Emerald, Red, 9 x 7)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Oval, Red, 10.91 x 7.27)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Diopside (Emerald, Green, 9.81 x 7.27)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 11.99 x 7.22)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Marquise, Red, 10 x 10)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 4ct Ruby (Emerald, Red, 10 x 8)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 4ct Sapphire (Emerald, Blue, 11 x 8)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Emerald, Red, 10 x 8)