×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3ct Ruby (Emerald, 9.21×6.82mm, Red) vs 5ct Ruby (Round, 10.22×10.22mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 5ct Ruby (10.22×10.22mm, round cut) appears 40% larger than 3ct Ruby (9.21×6.82mm, emerald cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

3ct Ruby (emerald cut)
vs
5ct Ruby (round cut)
red
 
red
9.21×6.82 mm 10.22×10.22 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3ct Ruby (emerald cut, 9.21×6.82mm, Red color)   Actual size of 5ct Ruby (round cut, 10.22×10.22mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 3ct Ruby (emerald cut, 9.21×6.82mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 5ct Ruby (round cut, 10.22×10.22mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
41% vs 61%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3ct Ruby Emerald (9.21×6.82mm, Red) and 5ct Ruby Round (10.22×10.22mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3 Ct Ruby (Emerald) 5 Ct Ruby (Round)
9.21×6.82 mm vs 10.22×10.22 mm
58.42 mm²   82.03 mm²
Face-up size outline for 5ct Ruby (10.22×10.22mm, round cut)
Face-up size outline for 3ct Ruby (9.21×6.82mm, emerald cut)
3ct Ruby Emerald (9.21×6.82mm)
5ct Ruby Round (10.22×10.22mm)
Difference: 40% (23.61 mm²)
5ct Ruby (Round, 10.22×10.22mm) has approx. 40% more face-up area than 3ct Ruby (Emerald, 9.21×6.82mm).


Popular comparisons: