×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

4ct Ruby (Round, 9.49×9.49mm, Red) vs 4ct Ruby (Cushion, 8.88×8.88mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 4ct Ruby (8.88×8.88mm, cushion cut) appears 0.3% larger than 4ct Ruby (9.49×9.49mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

4ct Ruby (round cut)
vs
4ct Ruby (cushion cut)
red
 
red
9.49×9.49 mm 8.88×8.88 mm
actual size
Actual size of 4ct Ruby (round cut, 9.49×9.49mm, Red color)   Actual size of 4ct Ruby (cushion cut, 8.88×8.88mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 4ct Ruby (round cut, 9.49×9.49mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 4ct Ruby (cushion cut, 8.88×8.88mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
57% vs 53%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 4ct Ruby Round (9.49×9.49mm, Red) and 4ct Ruby Cushion (8.88×8.88mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


4 Ct Ruby (Round) 4 Ct Ruby (Cushion)
9.49×9.49 mm vs 8.88×8.88 mm
70.73 mm²   70.97 mm²
Face-up size outline for 4ct Ruby (8.88×8.88mm, cushion cut)
Face-up size outline for 4ct Ruby (9.49×9.49mm, round cut)
4ct Ruby Round (9.49×9.49mm)
4ct Ruby Cushion (8.88×8.88mm)
Difference: 0.3% (0.24 mm²)
4ct Ruby (Cushion, 8.88×8.88mm) has approx. 0.3% more face-up area than 4ct Ruby (Round, 9.49×9.49mm).


Popular comparisons: